Re: non-empty list test

I think that ?has_content is probably what you want.

JR

On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Leos Literak <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> quite stupid question for such long time freemarker user :-)
>
> What is the best way to find out whether potentionally missing sequence
> is not empty?
>
> I used to use: (list?if_exists?size > 0)
> I never know whether exists operator will for empty list return true (as
> I expect) or not. So I use the trick with size, which is quite long to
> write. The documentation does not help there, so I would have to test
> it. I lack ?empty built-in: (list!?empty) in new syntax ..
>
> Leos
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> FreeMarker-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemarker-user
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/