Re: Searched: Alternative to #include returning the processed content

FreeMarker can use JSP tag libraries in templates, and there's a good  
taglib that provides caching as part of the OpenSymphony project -  
OSCache at <http://www.opensymphony.com/oscache/>. By integrating the  
OSCache into your templates using their JSP taglibs, you can achieve  
efficient caching for fragments of your output.

Attila.

--
home: http://www.szegedi.org
twitter: http://twitter.com/szegedi
weblog: http://constc.blogspot.com

On 2008.11.26., at 16:49, Alexander Reelsen wrote:

> Hello
>
> I am currently facing a problem, when using FreeMarker in  
> conjunction with
> the Alfresco CMS. I am writing a FreeMarker Template, which has to be
> pretty fast, as there will be a lot of requests in production. To  
> archive
> this, I created a few FreeMarker tags, which cache most of the  
> Alfresco
> functionality (like loading data from alfresco into freemarker,  
> which is
> quite a performance hog).
>
> In order to complete my caching framework, I would like to implement  
> some
> sort of prerendering functionality, which would be significant for the
> performance I guess.
>
> The document I am rendering consists of about 20 other documents,  
> which
> are formed as a tree, like the following one (only an example)
>
> - RootLevel
>   - L1.0
>     - L1.0.1
>     - L1.0.2
>   - L1.1
>     - L1.1.1
>   - L1.2
>     - L1.2.1
>       - L1.2.1.1
>   - L1.3
>     - L1.3.1
>     - L1.3.2
>     - L1.3.3
>     - L1.4.4
>
> You get it... This is possibly unlimited depth and I am currently  
> using
> the <#include> statement to display all the tree elements as a whole  
> tree,
> which works for displaying, but not for caching, as include  
> processes the
> template, but you cannot store the output of such a processing.
>
> I played around with ?interpret as well, but couldn't get any useful
> results either, which stored the rendered content, as you have to  
> use the
> <@interpretedVar /> notation in order the render the content (the
> interpret? only creates a model if I recall correctly).
>
> So any hints, of how to achieve a faster inclusion of my tree based
> concept would be really helpful. The most simple solution would be  
> to have
> an include, which returns the rendered text instead of processing the
> argument. Is this perhaps already somewhere built-in and I just did  
> not
> find it?
>
> Thanks for any help and take care.
>
>
> Regards, Alexander





-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/