Re: "pluggable" beans wrapper

Thanks Attila. This opens up a whole lot more flexibility :)

Cheers,

-g

On Dec 16, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Attila Szegedi wrote:

> You can certainly subclass BeansWrapper and override
> getModelFactory(). The sole reason it is marked protected instead of
> private is so that subclasses can override it. As for JavaDoc, I guess
> I'll remove the word "internal" -- not sure why's that there...
>
> Attila.
> --
> home: http://www.szegedi.org
> twitter: http://twitter.com/szegedi
> weblog: http://constc.blogspot.com
>
> On 2008.12.15., at 18:08, Grégory Joseph wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Having a pluggable beans wrappers - where components could somehow
>> "register" the wrappers on a per-class basis would be useful for me
>> right now. I thought I could use an extended version of
>> getModelFactory() which would use a Map<Class, ModelFactory>. Now I
>> read in ModelFactory's javadoc that it's an "internal interface".  
>> What
>> is the status on this ? How safe would it be for me and my project to
>> use this in the longer run ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -g
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas,  
> Nevada.
> The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to  
> help
> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
> _______________________________________________
> FreeMarker-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemarker-user



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/