Re: Was the JDom support removed/deprecated?
Jeremy Chone <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.freemarker.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Tx a lot, I will use the W3C Dom to make sure that I use a supported one. BTW, if I have a bean that return a W3C Element, would it be wrapped appropriately (allowing me to use the '.' notation to navigate the tree)? Jeremy, On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: > Saturday, January 24, 2009, 5:49:58 PM, Jeremy Chone wrote: > > > I am using ROME (RSS utility) which return JDom elements it some of > > their apis. When looking at Freemarker, I found the NodeListModel > > for JDOM, but it says it is deprecated in favor of NodeModel which seems > to support only w3c DOM. > > > > Am I missing something? > > > > Also, I was under the impression that if one of my bean/object > > returned a XML Element (JDOM or W3C Dom) the wrapping into a > > NodeListModel or NodeModel would be automatic. On this one I think I > > am missing something. Any explanation greatly appreciated. > > The wrapper for JDOM nodes is not maintained anymore, and will be > removed in 2.4. You should use W3C DOM... but it seems it's not > possible in you case. However, if the current JDOM wrapper works for > you, you can grab it from the source code, even rename the package to > com.yourcompany.freemarker.jdom or something, and put it into your own > jar, or pack it as part of your project. Then it will work with > FreeMarker 2.4 as well, also you can tweak it accord your needs. Using > custom wrappers is a normal (intended) practice after all. > > -- > Best regards, > Daniel Dekany > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ FreeMarker-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemarker-user