Re: Was the JDom support removed/deprecated?
Jeremy Chone <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.freemarker.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Cool, tx, this is the way I wanted it to work! Looking forward to the 2.4 version? BTW, are you guys working full time on freemarker. I am very impress by the quality and support. Regardless, great work! On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: > Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 12:25:15 AM, Jeremy Chone wrote: > > Tx a lot, I will use the W3C Dom to make sure that I use a supported one. > > > > BTW, if I have a bean that return a W3C Element, would it be > > wrapped appropriately (allowing me to use the '.' notation to navigate > the tree)? > > You should not wrap them. As your bean meant to be FreeMarker-unaware > (I suppose), it shouldn't use any FreeMarker specific classes. That > way the ObjectWrapper has full control (centralized control) over how > to present objects to the templates. The default wrapper will wrap W3C > Element-s so that you can use '.' notation. > > -- > Best regards, > Daniel Dekany > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ FreeMarker-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemarker-user