Re: Still using sourceforge for bug reporting?
Daniel Dekany <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.freemarker.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thursday, April 9, 2009, 11:31:53 PM, Stephan Müller wrote: > Payne, Matthew schrieb: >> I went to investigate the roadmap on sourceforge as was a little put off by the spam. >> Seems like the sourceforge interface doesn't give the picture that jira does. >> >> Does Freemarker have a jira instance? Are there any plans to set on up? > > We have a JIRA instance (http://freemarker.org/jira), but currently we > don't use it. > > Migrating the non-spam contents and switching to JIRA seems to be a good > idea, but so far nobody raised the issue. I'm willing to look into a > possible migration (and a necessary JIRA update, of course), but I don't > know what the others think about this. I would prefer Jira, however, then someone else than you should have the archives too. You see, if you disappear, currently we lose some of the development infrastructure, but that would be pretty much only our internal problem. But if the bug reports are gone... BTW, another very much missing feature is full text searching over the site. It's not at all like I'm saying that you should spend time with that, I'm just pointing out this fact, that's all. (Actually, if we had to search only inside the generated docs, Docgen alone certainly could take care of the whole business, assuming a JSP-capable server, which it is. I guess I could even make it work with the off-line version... that would be fun.) (And an usable forum wouldn't hurt either, but that's really low priority...) > Stephan. -- Best regards, Daniel Dekany ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com