Re: java.lang.Boolean undefined

FM really should have its own property handling to ensure it can  
handle all these cases. You can then add support for other cases like:

	addFoo(Foo foo);
	removeFoo(Foo foo);
	removeFoo(int i);

Those are nice for collections. I would imagine it a simple task to  
write a custom property handle or borrow someone else's. I wrote one  
for JCatapult and it took about a day to cover all the cases.

-bp


On Jun 30, 2009, at 10:11 AM, Attila Szegedi wrote:

> Truth be told, get/set works for boolean, so if you stick with get/
> set, you can't go wrong. I sort-of agree with the sentiment, but
> that's the way it is. FreeMarker is not doing property discovery on
> its own, it uses the Java standard "java.beans.Introspector" class
> which implements the JavaBeans property protocol, and it is what it
> is...
>
> Attila.
>
> On 2009.06.30., at 18:06, Newman, John W wrote:
>
>> Try renaming isObjectBoolean to getObjectBoolean.  Gotta love such a
>> quirky convention, I've got burnt by this a few times: boolean=is/
>> set, Boolean=get/set...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ben Storey [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 11:48 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: [FreeMarker-user] java.lang.Boolean undefined
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am having some problems with freemarker 2.3.14 and 2.3.15 when I
>> am trying to extract a value that returns a java.lang.Boolean value
>> and get this exception.
>>
>> Expression model.objectBoolean is undefined on line 1, column 64 in
>> testObjectBoolean.ftl.
>> The problematic instruction:
>> ----------
>> ==> ${model.objectBoolean?string} [on line 1, column 62 in
>> testObjectBoolean.ftl]
>> ----------
>>
>> Java backtrace for programmers:
>> ----------
>> freemarker.core.InvalidReferenceException: Expression
>> model.objectBoolean is undefined on line 1, column 64 in
>> testObjectBoolean.ftl.
>> 	at freemarker.core.TemplateObject.assertNonNull(TemplateObject.java:
>> 124)
>>
>>
>> For example I have attached a test case that I have been running and
>> the second test always fails even though the value has been set. Any
>> help on how to resolve this issue would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Ben
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> FreeMarker-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemarker-user


------------------------------------------------------------------------------