Re: Quick note about future number handling

Denis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.freemarker.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Le 20 mars 2010 à 08:53, Tom Fennelly a écrit :

> 
> Daniel Dekany wrote:
>> Saturday, March 20, 2010, 2:33:18 AM, Brian Pontarelli wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> I've run into issues over the past 4 years due to the default
>>> number handling in templates.  The problem is regarding the
>>> difference between ${n} and ${n?c} and it has consistently been an issue.
>>> 
>>> The problem is that testing generally doesn't find issues until
>>> database and other IDs exceed 1000 and FreeMarker begins to insert commas such as:
>>> 
>>>        1,020
> Hi there.
> 
> If you wanted to maintain backward compatibility, perhaps you could 
> leave the default as is and provide a method on the 
> Template/Configuration instance for overriding the default formatting.  
> Could also do same with a new computer readable default, allowing 
> existing users to override the default back to the old human readable 
> default (which I've also found to be a total PITA :) ).
> 
> In fact.... would this be nice to have for all types... including Dates 
> etc e.g.
> 
>    configuration.setDefaultFormatting(Number.class, "c");
>    configuration.setDefaultFormatting(Date.class, "string('yyyy-MM-dd')");
>    // etc...
> 
> 
> Actually ... just looked at the API and it appears to already be there 
> on the Configuration class i.e. setNumberFormat(String) and 
> setDateFormat(String) :)  Why did I never see that before :)

It is in the documentation:

http://freemarker.org/docs/pgui_config_settings.html

http://freemarker.org/docs/app_faq.html#faq_number_grouping (linked in the Built-ins for numbers page)

Simple code:

Environment env = myTemplate.createProcessingEnvironment(root, out);
env.setNumberFormat(env.getCNumberFormat());
env.process(); 

-- Denis.

> 
> Regards,
> 
> T.
>> 
>>> I know there are a number of ideas floating about for an
>>> incompatible release (possibly 3.0) and I would like to toss this
>>> one in there.
>>> 
>>> -bp
>>> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.