Re: Is there a more elegant way to do null checks?
"Newman, John W" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.freemarker.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <D688C4D318A63D4290AA94A33E06F7D20285E7EDDB@msxmbxnsprd14.acct.upmchs.net> |
The ! operator is the best
${(patient.name.first)!"<Not Entered>"}
[#list (patient.diagnoses)![] as dx]
${(dx.code)!"<Unknown>"}
[/#list]
[#if (template.scripts.inline.head)!{}?has_content]
Do something
[/#if]
For the last one there I am not 100% on the order of precedence, you may need an extra paren before the ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Haderka [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2010 4:52 PM
To: FreeMarker-user
Subject: Re: [FreeMarker-user] Is there a more elegant way to do null checks?
When I rewrote my tag files as macros, I produced a lot of bloated template
code like so:
[#if (template?? && template.scripts?? && template.scripts.inline?? &&
template.scripts.inline.head??)]do something[/#if]
Is there a more elegant way to check if the head value is empty? I have
I'm not an expert, but would not something like:
[#if (template.scripts.inline.head)??]do something[/#if]
do?
Jan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
FreeMarker-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemarker-user
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev