Re: Possible room for performance improvement when using TemplateDirectiveModel and TemplateMethodModelEx
Daniel Henrique Alves Lima <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.freemarker.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Daniel. I'm not sure (yet). I believe FreeMarker performance should be close to GSP performance in this case. FreeMarker is performing worse by a large factor. I'm trying to discover if Tags plugin has something to do with it. Thanks. On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 00:02 +0100, Daniel Dekany wrote: > Saturday, January 15, 2011, 1:26:19 PM, Daniel Henrique Alves Lima wrote: > > > And i need to better investigate this: > > > > http://grails.1312388.n4.nabble.com/FreeMarker-vs-GSP-for-Dynamic-Template-Rendering-tp3213939p3219004.html > > What exactly is the question regarding this? > > I don't know how GSP works, but if it's compiled to Groovy, then > FreeMarker most certainly will be slower that that. But if the tags > called do anything non-trivial, plus the template does I/O (sending > the response), I don't think it should be much a slowdown. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Protect Your Site and Customers from Malware Attacks Learn about various malware tactics and how to avoid them. Understand malware threats, the impact they can have on your business, and how you can protect your company and customers by using code signing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl