Re: Null Cache Storage

Daniel,

I didn't know there was another option for string templates in the library,
that may be interesting for many users, will play more with the library and
let you know if I need your help there.

I didn't mean to rush you to a release, sorry, do you have a timeframe for
2.3.17 already?

Thanks,

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote:

> Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 4:04:07 PM, Fernando Ribeiro wrote:
>
> > Daniel,
> >
> > Thanks for the quick feedback and the new NullCacheStorage class.
> > I'm currently refreshing the FreeMarker component of the Apache
> > Camel framework (http://camel.apache.org/), which has its own
> > implementation of a null cache storage. It was (probably) created
> > because that component is mostly used with "dynamic" string
> > templates that the developer really may not want to cache.
>
> It's possible to create Template-s from String-s without using
> Configuration.getTemplate, and be by bypassing the storage mechanism
> and thus the caching. Also, note that the cache not just decreases
> I/O, but also prevents the re-parsing of templates. Parsing templates
> is somewhat expensive (CPU and GC).
>
> > Can you please release the current build as 2.3.17? I need it to be
> > available from Maven to use it in the Apache projects (will also
> > update ServiceMix to it).
>
> I can't just suddenly make a release... If all you need is a
> NullCacheStorage, your implementation is as good as mine. But if you
> can give a deadline for me, we can talk about a release.
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > 2011/4/20 Daniel Dekany <[email protected]>
> > Here it is (try it / use it):
> >
> http://freemarker.org:8085/download/FM-BRANCH23/artifacts/build-200/Library/freemarker.jar
> >
> >
> > Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 2:45:12 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> >
> >> Well... a new MruCacheStorage(0, 0) *should* do that (never tried that
> >> though), but of course that would be silly. Since you don't have a
> >> Contributor's License Agreement and this is easy to do, I will just go
> >> ahead and implement this tonight.
> >>
> >>
> >> Wednesday, April 20, 2011, 1:29:27 PM, Fernando Ribeiro wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> If I don't want a template loader to use a cache at all, I need to
> >>> write a new (null) implementation of the CacheStorage interface,
> >>> right? If so, I can write it and submit it for inclusion, what do you
> think?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Fernando
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >  Daniel Dekany
> >
> >
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  Daniel Dekany
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev

_______________________________________________
FreeMarker-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freemarker-user