Re: autocompletion
Jonathan Sambrook <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.galeon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20021126122952.GI22395@jsambrook> |
At 22:19 on Tue 26/11/02, [email protected] masquerading as 'Jeff Waugh' wrote: > <quote who="Jonathan Sambrook"> > > > > I agree with you about needing a pref. But until we have that pref, I > > > think it should be enabled by default because otherwise most people will > > > not know about it. Also, using TAB for showing the list should be > > > removed (or disabled by default) for accessibility reasons. > > > > The actual completion key should be configurable. > > You have got to be kidding... Nope. It exists as an option I've made use of elsewhere. So since it enabled me, as a user, to set my preference, I know that it is something (at least one) user had a preference on. > > What it defaults to is debatable. Tab, because of the accessibility issue, > > doesn't sound like an ideal candidate for the default, but is what I'd > > choose to use. Ctrl-F? > > http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/keynav/gtk_text.html > > Ctrl-Tab navigates out of multiline text boxes because they require the use > of Tab for other reasons. That applies very easily to the address entry box > case in Galeon. Meaning tabs are fine. > *Please* make an effort to think about *solving* things before throwing > preferences at them. The software is much, much better for it. In general I agree that "everything is a preference" is bad for maintainability, explicability, etc. What are the criteria y'all operate by for creating new preferences? (It seems to be a sensitive issue round here...) Jonathan -- Jonathan Sambrook Software Developer Designer Servers
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE942lASrN2iQFE+lgRAubpAJ9q0NNy7X1CjlIphEo3R64wnplxwACeMSfm ojRa8UKY9mhrglUaMRZRSQw= =l1rX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----