RE: Awesome new Mozilla roadmap!
Julien Olivier <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnome.desktop,gmane.comp.gnome.apps.epiphany,gmane.comp.web.galeon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> The adoption of a simpler interface by mozilla.org is very positive and > partially overlap our project goals but I think there is still a very strong > point to continue our effort. > I think the native interface is the best way to achieve the GNOME integration > a browser need to be really usable. It's easier and more likely to produce > good results. Native widgets and HIG compliance are alone already worth > the effort. I really think that if we need a native browser to make it usable, then there is something broken in the Linux desktop area. And creating a "native" browser won't fix the actual problem which is that non-GTK apps don't integrate well in GNOME and non-QT apps don't integrate well in KDE. So, instead of writing a native GNOME web browser, wouldn't it be smarter to work on Phoenix integration on the GNOME/KDE desktops (maybe using freedesktop.org standards) ? As for the HIG compliance, why not trying to make Phoenix HIG-compliant ? Why would'nt Phoenix developers want their app to be HIG-ified ? > I think there are very good reasons to encourage mozilla interoperability > (not last that galeon/epiphany will benefit from them too). But I'm also > convinced the better way to reach the goal of an usable browser for GNOME > is to use their embedding technology (as even Blizzard seem to suggest). > So, in short, the adoption of Phoenix encourage us to keep up our simplification > effort and to push forward system integration. > > Another aspect of the new roadmap is the adoption of a more modular architecture, > with the GRE being the base of both native and multiplatform browsers. Well, > these are just great news for us ... > I think GNOME should seriously consider to use Gecko as unique render engine > in the future, when the editing problems are solved. > I think the main interest of having the GRE is that it will be easy to embed HTML display/creation in Linux apps and I think we agree on that. But as I said upper, I think that should not be a reason to write a web browser from it as there is already a soon-to-be-great browser based on it and called (temporarily) Phoenix. I'd like to see GRE used in Evolution, Nautilus and GNOME-Help but I wouldn't like to have to choose between Phoenix, Epiphany and Galeon as I really think it is possible to focus on the development of 1 perfect web browser that fits well on Linux, whichever desktop you use. > Hope this is what you wanted to know. Feel free to ask more if the reply > was not satisfactory :) > > Marco > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list