RE: Awesome new Mozilla roadmap!

Julien Olivier <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnome.desktop,gmane.comp.gnome.apps.epiphany,gmane.comp.web.galeon.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> The adoption of a simpler interface by mozilla.org is very positive and
> partially overlap our project goals but I think there is still a very strong
> point to continue our effort.
> I think the native interface is the best way to achieve the GNOME integration
> a browser need to be really usable. It's easier and more likely to produce
> good results. Native widgets and HIG compliance are alone already worth
> the effort.

I really think that if we need a native browser to make it usable, then
there is something broken in the Linux desktop area. And creating a
"native" browser won't fix the actual problem which is that non-GTK apps
don't integrate well in GNOME and non-QT apps don't integrate well in
KDE. So, instead of writing a native GNOME web browser, wouldn't it be
smarter to work on Phoenix integration on the GNOME/KDE desktops (maybe
using freedesktop.org standards) ?

As for the HIG compliance, why not trying to make Phoenix HIG-compliant
? Why would'nt Phoenix developers want their app to be HIG-ified ?

> I think there are very good reasons to encourage mozilla interoperability
> (not last that galeon/epiphany will benefit from them too). But I'm also
> convinced the better way to reach the goal of an usable browser for GNOME
> is to use their embedding technology (as even Blizzard seem to suggest).
> So, in short, the adoption of Phoenix encourage us to keep up our simplification
> effort and to push forward system integration.
> 
> Another aspect of the new roadmap is the adoption of a more modular architecture,
> with the GRE being the base of both native and multiplatform browsers. Well,
> these are just great news for us ...
> I think GNOME should seriously consider to use Gecko as unique render engine
> in the future, when the editing problems are solved.
> 

I think the main interest of having the GRE is that it will be easy to
embed HTML display/creation in Linux apps and I think we agree on that.
But as I said upper, I think that should not be a reason to write a web
browser from it as there is already a soon-to-be-great browser based on
it and called (temporarily) Phoenix. I'd like to see GRE used in
Evolution, Nautilus and GNOME-Help but I wouldn't like to have to choose
between Phoenix, Epiphany and Galeon as I really think it is possible to
focus on the development of 1 perfect web browser that fits well on
Linux, whichever desktop you use.

> Hope this is what you wanted to know. Feel free to ask more if the reply
> was not satisfactory :)
> 
> Marco
> 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.