Re: galeon 1.3 - feature killer?
Yanko Kaneti <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.galeon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 10:05, Eivind Tagseth wrote: > * Tommi Komulainen <[email protected]> [030423 17:44]: > > On Tue, 2003-04-22 at 15:37, Hanno Böck wrote: > > > > > > - Most options aren't available through the galeon-options, instead you > > > have moved them to gnome-control-center (proxy, themes etc.). > > > I don't use gnome, but I would have to install lots of things from gnome > > > just to configure galeon. > > > As much fun as it might be to to reinvent wheel over and over again, > > it's nothing but a waste of resources. > > [snip] > > > Galeon is a gnome browser and as such we delegate and share as > > much as we can with the common infrastructure, that's the whole point. > > All you say is very true of course, it doesn't make sense maintaining > mime handling more than a few places, and it doesn't make sense wasting > time reimplementing it all the time. I do find it a bit strange though, > that Gnome chose to reimplement the wheel (a.k.a. mailcap) and thus make > sure that you _have_ to maintain these settings twice, once for gnome apps, > and then again for all other apps... My old netscape handler settings > were working just fine, _and_ could be shared by mutt... You might want follow the discussion on https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/xdg-list where people are discussing how suitable a mailcap based system is for the current desktop needs. Starting with the "MIME Activation" thread of this month. Regards Yanko ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf