Re: Re: Find bookmarks comments

Tommi Komulainen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.galeon.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 14:06, Ricardo Fernández Pascual wrote:
> El mar, 26-08-2003 a las 21:46, Tommi Komulainen escribió:
> > 
> > IMHO, the inconsistency can be easily avoided by unselecting everything
> > from the folder pane when the search starts.  When you click on a folder
> > again, just forget/clear the search and show the folder contents as
> > usual again.
> > 
> 
> Ok. I'm not totally satisfied from a "philosophical" point of view, but
> in practice this will work. And I want to get this done now.

Yay, nice, almost what I expected. ;)  Looks great regardless.  I forgot
to say, but I think the search entry should be located only above the
bookmarks pane, that way it's more clear that it doesn't really affect
the folders.  Like:

+-----------------------------------------+
| Stuff  | Search: _____________ |Options||
| + Even +--------------------------------+
| + More | Galeon : the web, only the web |


I don't actually quite like the options dialog, but since you can't put
checkbuttons in an optionmenu and have it behave nicely, I don't have an
alternative figured.

But are those options even necessary?  I'd imagine the dialog is just
too cumbersome to be used in practice; it's much quicker to let the
search list "too many" matches and locate the exact match manually.


Minor issues:
- Select a folder, search for something, clear the search entry -> the
contents of the selected folder are shown but the folder itself is not
selected.
- Words separated by spaces should probably work like that, instead of
being treated as a single string?
- Ctrl-F could still focus the search entry, for convenience?


And then, of course, from the we-love-the-HIG department:
- Search needs a mnemonic, Options mnemonic conflicts with Notes
  (I'd also suggest N_ame and _Nicks to maximize the use of wide
characters.)
- The whole options dialog is missing mnemonics, if it's still there


> I don't buy this. "Copy" is a well know command amongst all applications
> and I think we should not change its semantics. Also, doing this change
> "copy" will be unrelated to "Cut", which is another inconsistency with
> respect to the rest of the desktop.
> 
> In my opinion, the preferred way to add aliases would be the current one
> or a dialog to select parent categories like epiphany's.

Actually, I think you can keep "Copy" as-is, just add "Paste Alias" :) 
Shouldn't be changing any well known semantics.  I also think for DnD
there are modifier keys that provide similar function...  Yes, from
nautilus:

- Copy: Ctrl-drag
- Link: Ctrl-Shift-drag
- Ask: Alt-drag


-- 
Tommi Komulainen                                 [email protected]
GPG 1024D/68388EE6    6FD6 DD79 EB38 BF6F 3533  09C0 04A8 9871 6838 8EE6
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/TNkrBKiYcWg4juYRApL6AKCebBIy8eH58vKzSboseXicxhYxmwCfaItQ
sw79Z81w0mKT0XNPbTxN8ac=
=Zpo2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.