Re: Re: Find bookmarks comments
Ricardo Fernández Pascual <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.galeon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
El dom, 31-08-2003 a las 15:00, Tommi Komulainen escribió: > On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 15:02, Ricardo Fernández Pascual wrote: > > El dom, 31-08-2003 a las 11:27, Crispin Flowerday escribió: > > > > > > 1) You shouldn't be able to expand the folders in the right hand pane, > > > it looks very confusing when you do have the folder trees expanded in > > > both panes > > > > I don't agree. The folders are not expanded by default, so it is not > > confusing. Unless the user wants to expand the folder it will not be > > expanded. And not expandable folders are quite useless really. > > I must agree with Crispin on this one. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I > don't recall seeing such duplication of hierarchy anywhere else, but the > suggested alternative can be seen in many places. > Again, the folders are not expanded unless the user clicks on the expander arrow. I can't see how that little arrow could lead to any confusion. Removing it would be restricting the interface unnecessarily, which I really don't like. > Take, for example, any file manager with tree on the left and folder > contents on the right, the right hand side is always flat, and you can't > expand the folders. I vaguely recall reading something about the mac finder allowing you exactly that, but I have never seen the finder myself. (Anyone with a mac can confirm this? or was it another program?) Even if current file managers don't allow you it, that does not mean it would be confusing. Actually, I think I would like it. I would allow me to quickly look what's inside a folder without having to change my current folder. > Double-clicking on a folder replaces the right hand > side with the contents of the said folder. This can be done, but I don't like it very much. > > While the bookmarks editor isn't identical to a file manager, it's very > much alike and following a familiar behavior is preferred, in my > opinion. Maybe, but up the point that it makes sense. I we wanted 100% ui compatibility with nautilus we would be writing a gnome-vfs plugin or whatever crack is necessary to show bookmarks as files. I think the resulting ui would be worse. > > > 2) double click on a folder in the right pane should navigate into that > > > folder (rather than opening the properties window), ditto double click > > > on the folder in the left pane should open it, think of a file manager. > > > > About double click on the right pane: I think double clicking on folder > > should do the same thing as double clicking on sites. Either open the > > properties window or activate it. > > I think double-clicking should be activate in both cases, at least > that's what I'm expecting double-click to do. We could do this. > And for folders that > means expanding the folder, In the rest of galeon ui, activating a folder means opening its contents (in windows or tabs), fwiw. > and for bookmarks opening the page. At > least in my mind activating means 'Open this thing', not 'Show metadata > of this thing'. > > Now, I agree opening the bookmark in the old window can be problematic, > therefore I think we could do the same as from the command line, open a > new window by default. This would be in line with the behavior if the > bookmarks editor were a separate application; activating a bookmark > would in essence be calling galeon from command line, opening a new > window. Ok, this can be done. Now that we have the editing pane at the bottom of the window the properties dialog is not as important as before. BTW: opening in a new window is already the first option of the context menu. -- Ricardo Fernández Pascual [email protected] Murcia. España. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf