Re: Re: [Conglomerate-devel] Re: Galeon 1.3.15 for x86-64 crashes
Tommi Komulainen <[email protected]> Sat, 26 Jun 2004 15:46:27 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.galeon.devel,gmane.editors.conglomerate.devel,gmane.comp.gnome.nautilus |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 12:28 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 10:08:36AM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Nicola wrote: > > > > > I've just installed FC2 on my new AMD64 3200+. > > > I am using the version for x86_64. Previously I was > > > running fc1 for x86. I've installed your package for > > > galeon: > > > galeon-1.3.15-1.1.fc2.dag.x86_64.rpm > > > all seems fine, but starting galeon is impossible. It > > > just segfaults: > > > galeon-bin[29699]: segfault at 0000003700000000 rip > > > 00000037f03100da rsp 0000007fbffff060 error 4 > > > galeon-bin[30007]: segfault at 0000003700000000 rip > > > 00000037f03100da rsp 0000007fbffff060 error 4 > > > galeon-bin[30383]: segfault at 0000003700000000 rip > > > 00000037f03100da rsp 0000007fbffff060 error 4 > > > galeon-bin[30774]: segfault at 0000003700000000 rip > > > 00000037f03100da rsp 0000007fbfffee50 error 4 > > > > Yes, I've experienced the same problems. 1.3.14 is working fine. > > This should definitely be reported. Conglomerate has a similar > > problem so in my opinion this is due to the new gtk+ 2.4 adoption. > > > > It must be a general problem with gtk+ 2.4 on x86_64. > > > <snip what="nautilus also"/> > > > > > Hardware is fine, double checked. No other software > > > crashes, no sig11 etc. But it remains impossible to > > > use galeon - cannot compile from source, at a certain > > > point pretends to use 32 bit libs. > > > > Let's put the involved parties in a copy. > > Has some of the x86-64 owners run a unstripped version > in gdb to get a backtrace? Please do, without a decent backtrace there's not really much we can do. However, in the meantime you could also try adding -DG_ENABLE_DEBUG=1 in CPPFLAGS and rebuild. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144370 might be looking different on different architecture. -- Tommi Komulainen [email protected] GPG 1024D/68388EE6 6FD6 DD79 EB38 BF6F 3533 09C0 04A8 9871 6838 8EE6
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBA3XAjBKiYcWg4juYRAnqOAJ95I9R3v8UilUM9uZ/zBV47pBRIQQCgtbvP GeikY9pqwhm2vBTB9EwxA+U= =w0h5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----