RE: My 2 cents

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.galeon.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>-- Messaggio originale --
>From: Philip Langdale <[email protected]>
>To: galeon-devel <[email protected]>
>Subject: [Galeon-devel] My 2 cents
>Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 10:17:49 -0500
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>First off, I should apologise for my lack of presence as of late. I'm
>working a full time co-op term at IBM right now and it, predictably,
>eats most of my time up.
>
>Anyone who's had the misfortune of being in my presence when the subject
>of the HIG comes up will know what I think all too well, so I'm just
>going to throw the following out on the table:
>
>As mentioned already: It's a really dumb idea to alienate your current
>user base in an attempt to cater to potential future users who don't
>actually exist at the moment. It's even worse when obtaining said future
>users is predicated on gnome2 actually getting any traction. I remain
>thoroughly unconvinced of the later.
>
>I still use gnome1 and galeon1, meaning that I'm hard pressed to roll
>stuff in to galeon2, as marco is well aware. Why is this? Lack of
>features and configurability. I simply don't like the direction that
>gnome2 was taken, which is also the direction that galeon2 is going as
>well; The user is stupid and, in anycase, Seth Nickell knows best.
>
>The tyranny of the HIG sure as hell isn't producing applications that I
>find easier to use; instead I am forced to conform my usage patterns to
>Seth's ideal. No one is going to convince me that that's an improvement.
>
>For the time being, I still use galeon1, and I'd like to think that I'm
>still maintaining it in some sense, though my lack of time limits what
I
>can do. Obviously, this is probably not a sustainable long term
>solution; but what is? Grit your teeth and take the gnome2 experience?
>

I'm not going to try to convince you again because I did too many times
already. I'll just say that you are looking things in a totally wrong perspective.
Me and other people that keep bringing up the importance of the HIG and
in general feel some of Seth ideas good, are not doing it to blindly follow
him or the HIG. It's just that we share a view of usability.
You have all the right to disagree with our view, but keeping to talk of
the "one true seth way, the hig tiranny" will not help in any way.
Every OS in this world has an HIG: it's not the only one true way, it's
just a tool to keep different applications consistent.
The results of not having such a guide are there, and anyone can see them.
Or you want to tell me that gnome1 apps and in general unix apps are really
so consistent and easy to use ? ;)

Marco



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.