Re: Re: [Usability]Galeon 2 usability
Marco Pesenti Gritti <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.galeon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1034599715.2211.48.camel@balurdi> |
Il lun, 2002-10-14 alle 14:27, Tommi Komulainen ha scritto: > On Mon, 2002-10-14 at 15:14, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: > > > > Man now dont come saying shortcuts to geeky features put in the menubar > > are not obtrusive ! > > What is obtrusive for you ? A dialog coming up every three seconds about > > disabling js ??? > > I don't think few entries in menus are obtrusive if they're placed > sensibly. For example sake, I argue the Side Bane is a geeky feature¹, > do you find its entry in View menu obtrusive? > I think there are few things more obstrusive that a menu entry, esp if it's a dup of another part of the interface. > 1. It's not the same level of geekiness, but still can be considered > something out of the ordinary. Wasn't the "only the web" motto used for > some time to try to keep it out of galeon? > What is geeky in a sidebar ? What I dont like of it is the partial redundance with bookmarks/history dialogs but that's something different ... Also consider that a single checkbox, that isnt in any way going to confuse the user (at least not much like a technical item.), with an immediately visible effect, give access to several functionalities. And, again, there is just one way to show the sidebar. You want to have two to enable javscript. Would I figth to keep sidebar support ? Nope. Would I figth to remove it ? Neither. Marco ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf