Re: Galeon 2 User Interface
Ricardo Fernández Pascual <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.galeon.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Marco wrote: > HIG compliance > The new version of galeon is going to follow version 1.0 of the gnome > user guidelines. Unless there are very seriuos reasons to make an > exception not following it will be considered a bug. "I follow the HIG > only when I like it" is not a legitimate approach. Any areas where we > diverge from the HIG will communicated to the HIG team for future > consideration. Even if you don't believe me, I agree with this objective. But, as someone already said in th usability list the HIG: is a Guideline. You have to use your common sense when reading it and applying it to your app. > Gnome integration > Galeon's main goal is to be integrated with the gnome desktop. We dont > aim to make galeon usable outside Gnome. If someone will like to use > it anyway, it's just a plus. Ex: Making people happy that don't have > control center installed is not a good reason to have mime > configuration in galeon itself. I always agreed with this. For me Galeon exists in order to Gnomeify the already great Mozilla browser. > Simple design > Feature bloat and user interface clutter is evil :) Sure. > Preferences > We will follow the new gnome policy about preferences. I think Havoc > already explained it a lot better than I could ever do. Havoc's essay Havoc essay makes sense. Except that you have to take it with a grain of salt. It is just too extremist. Things are not so black and white. > User target > We target non-technical users by design. This happens to be 90% of the > user population. > (Technical details should not exposed in the interface) > We target web users, we dont directly target web developers. > A few geek-oriented feautures can be kept as long as they are > non-obtrusive. > Ex. Javascript disabling in the prefs dialog Here is where I disagree. 1st: Not targeting web developers is dumb. Web developers decide what browsers will be supported and used. 2nd: Disabling JavaScript is geek-oriented??? Everything that is a bit more complicated than "Click here to start" is geeky for you? 3rd: You clearly don't target me. I think it's dumb to hack in a project that does not target me as a user. I want a browser that I would enjoy using. I value usability, consistency and all that very much too. Otherwise I would be using Mozilla. But I value usefulness a lot. It seems that your first target is to be part of the official gnome desktop or something. I would very much like it too, but not at the price of making dumb decisions. Sincerely, Ricardo. -- Ricardo Fernández Pascual [email protected] Murcia. España. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf