Re: why are there no themes for galeon? and is galeon 1.3 cooler than 1.2, let's vote

Adam Hooper <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.galeon.user
Message-ID <1110861100.16006.13.camel@hera>
On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 23:19 -0500, philip dahlquist wrote:
> i want to take a vote, and i would like to hear from every galeon user,
> and you can say whatever you want, tell me i'm stupid, tell me to shut
> up, whatever, but answer this, and tell me why:  

Good thing the users aren't developing Galeon, or it'd be a huge,
disgusting pile of garbage. Hell, even Internet Explorer would be an
improvement.

The Galeon developers are smart people who make the most of their (free,
voluntary) time to produce what they think is a superior browser. And
including every feature in the world obviously won't make a superior
browser, it'll just make a confusing one. So they have to find the
"happy medium". Naturally, that "happy medium" makes some people
unhappy.

I suggest that Galeon's developers write up a manifesto, as Epiphany's
did. The manifesto tells its users what to expect and what they have no
hope of getting.

> 5)   what was the motivation for the interface change?

Galeon follows GNOME themes. (An example of "what you have no hope of
getting": app-specific themes in GNOME programs....)

-- 
Adam Hooper <[email protected]>
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCNmUs90GtBxQ61zARAtvVAJ98aTkEts1ctUOgTvx4r/WI43aPvwCg4VGm
jMogG+SAaUTBDsRjED6HXwE=
=I4ob
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.