Re: topicless posting continues
Bharat Mediratta <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.gallery.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAESa+_m8g+9cLPZZEThTDw2rx096LPAa_FutzxwSxv0KdoE0UQ@mail.gmail.com> |
PS, here's our Mollom activity graph: http://mollom.com/statistics.swf?key=54f4552a707b235473c27af4bc42b6e2 On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Bharat Mediratta <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was frustrated with Mollom - until I looked at its stats. On 8/1 we > sent 1303 messages to Mollom and it blocked 1272 (97.6%) of them. So it's > definitely doing a good job - just not quite good enough. I'm guessing > that the work you're doing reporting these to Mollom is really helping - > thanks a ton, Wayne. > > I've been looking through the code to see if it's easy to reject or take > appropriate action on these posts, but I'm not enough of a Drupal expert > here. Chad can you help? > > It looks like node_form_submit is calling node_submit which is invoking > hook_submit which winds up in forum.module's forum_submit. That's not > getting the tid on node properly, not sure why - but I think really what we > want at that point is to just fail the node insert entirely. What's the > best way to do that? I an hack it by throwing an exception and catching it > in node_form_submit and silently fail, but is there some Drupal way to do > it? > > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Wayne Patterson <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> This guy is apparently posting by skipping the form as the form would >> force him to choose a topic. >> He is getting 3 or 4 of these through a day. >> examples >> http://gallery.menalto.com/node/107804 >> http://gallery.menalto.com/node/107803 >> I have reported to molem literally hundreds of louis vuitton posts and >> yet they still get through - very frustrating. >> And the pure Asian or Cerilic posts >> http://gallery.menalto.com/node/107798 >> or just plain garbage >> http://gallery.menalto.com/node/107801 >> >> I don't think forcing him into a topic is the answer. >> >> -Wayne >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Bharat Mediratta <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> I still don't fully understand what's going on here so I don't want to >>> take any strong action. Ie, I'd hate to find out that there's some bug in >>> the UI which some browser allows these through and we wind up banning a >>> long time user and deleting all their posts :-/ >>> >>> How much of these posts are we getting? >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Wayne Patterson < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Bharat Mediratta <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ok - I tried adding in a hack to force those posts into the "General >>>>> chit-chat" forum. Let me know if you see any weird side-effects. >>>> >>>> >>>> Ok, yes this does force the spammer into the "General chit-chat" forum. >>>> But that means we still have a hacker posting spam. Can he simply be >>>> banned then and there instead? >>>> >>> >>> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ __[ g a l l e r y - d e v e l ]_________________________ [ list info/archive --> http://gallery.sf.net/lists.php ] [ gallery info/FAQ/download --> http://gallery.sf.net ]