Re: Drop old IE support?
Mike Miller <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Feb 2013 20:32:36 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.gallery.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAGYq59fomEJUrt02HNzm+rBH6dxeP++HL-g=PznU5Q-a7oVk5Q@mail.gmail.com> |
I see no reason to retain support for IE6 or 7 either, but I know that at least in my case, the majority of my visitors are family members, many of whom are not particularly computer savvy. The themedispatcher contrib module (http://codex.galleryproject.org/Gallery3:Modules:themedispatcher) also provides an easy way to serve a custom (limited) theme if the default switches to something that requires IE8 or higher. I've written a few modules, but I'm simply horrible with graphic design; I can't design even a basic fallback theme, but I think if we had one, it would make the switch a genuine no-brainer. Without it, I'm a bit concerned about some of my viewers (or as concerned as I can be when sharing my thoughts with people who work for free...) -- Mike On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Chad Kieffer <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have no qualms about dropping support for IE 6 or 7 and agree that we > should continue to support 8 on XP. > > Anyone had a look at their Gallery (2 or 3) browser stats lately? What > about browser version/adoption reports? > > On Feb 25, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Shad Laws <shad-xpYdmXCiSuZWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey gang, > > > > Question 1: is it worth trying to maintain and test IE6 and IE7 > > support? My personal vote is no. I'm doing my best to check IE8 and > > IE9 properly, but really don't want to attempt to fire up an IE6 > > installation for testing. > > > > Question 2: should we continue to support IE8? My personal vote is > > yes. It's the latest IE an XP user could use, and I doubt I'm the > > only one whose grandparents would be upset when they can't see photos > > with their IE8-powered XP machines :-). > > > > Some background: as some of you may know, jQuery 2.0 is already in the > > works and officially drops old IE support. They define "old IE" as > > anything pre-IE9. > > > > http://blog.jquery.com/2013/01/15/jquery-1-9-final-jquery-2-0-beta-migrate-final-released/ > > > > I imagine in the not-too-distant future we'll be running jQuery 1.9 > > and 2.0 simultaneously, as suggested in the blog post above. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Take care, > > Shad ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb __[ g a l l e r y - d e v e l ]_________________________ [ list info/archive --> http://gallery.sf.net/lists.php ] [ gallery info/FAQ/download --> http://gallery.sf.net ]