Re: Drop old IE support?
Wayne Patterson <[email protected]> Mon, 25 Feb 2013 19:49:11 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.gallery.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJc9TdZdL4QwegZqWyQ7_rBmd7DAEthA6WVS2-_xx+EozPFkow@mail.gmail.com> |
I stopped supporting IE<9 last year. MSFT still owes me $millions$ for fixing that garbage I like the idea of a fallback theme, or better yet offer Chrome frame I thought I read somewhere that Google was onboard w/ jQuery in dropping support for IE 8 and below @shad I use uploadifive now. I'm sure the author would donate to a project this big. BUT there is no FILE API support for Safari<5 and IE<10 you'd have to build the iframe kludge to support older browsers. -Wayne Hey gang, > > Question 1: is it worth trying to maintain and test IE6 and IE7 > support? My personal vote is no. I'm doing my best to check IE8 and > IE9 properly, but really don't want to attempt to fire up an IE6 > installation for testing. > > Question 2: should we continue to support IE8? My personal vote is > yes. It's the latest IE an XP user could use, and I doubt I'm the > only one whose grandparents would be upset when they can't see photos > with their IE8-powered XP machines :-). > > Some background: as some of you may know, jQuery 2.0 is already in the > works and officially drops old IE support. They define "old IE" as > anything pre-IE9. > > http://blog.jquery.com/2013/01/15/jquery-1-9-final-jquery-2-0-beta-migrate-final-released/ > > I imagine in the not-too-distant future we'll be running jQuery 1.9 > and 2.0 simultaneously, as suggested in the blog post above. > > Thoughts? > > Take care, > Shad > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb __[ g a l l e r y - d e v e l ]_________________________ [ list info/archive --> http://gallery.sf.net/lists.php ] [ gallery info/FAQ/download --> http://gallery.sf.net ]