Re: Getting 3.0.6 ready to ship!

Thanks Shad.

Ill update the docs as some users would like to keep on the 3.0.x branch 
and only use zip files to keep up.

Dave
On 2013-03-12 2:35 AM, Shad Laws wrote:
> Hey Dave,
>
> Re: album add, thanks for catching that - see discussion on issue ticket.
>
> Re: newest zip, good question... seems like we should probably say
> this somewhere in the docs... :-)
>
> The newest 3.0.x can be downloaded at:
> http://github.com/gallery/gallery3/zipball/3.0.x
> https://github.com/gallery/gallery3/archive/3.0.x.zip
>
> Likewise, people can check out master (newest of the new) or 3.1.x
> (lags behind master a bit):
> http://github.com/gallery/gallery3/zipball/master
> https://github.com/gallery/gallery3/archive/master.zip
> http://github.com/gallery/gallery3/zipball/3.1.x
> https://github.com/gallery/gallery3/archive/3.1.x.zip
>
> I think they work if you do tar instead of zip, too.
>
> Tale care,
> Shad
>
>
> On 12 March 2013 01:59, Dave Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Just one more issue I can see from some of the recent changes.
>> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/gallery/ticket/2054
>>
>> On a semi related note; how can I tell users to download an experimental
>> version either of the two branches 3.0.6+ and 3.1 Currently there is a zip
>> file: https://github.com/gallery/gallery3/archive/master.zip but I believe
>> that is the 3.1 branch?
>>
>> Cheers!
>> Dave
>>
>> On 2013-03-11 12:28 PM, Shad Laws wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> A new and fairly major bug appeared on the forums: Gallery v3.0.5 no
>>> longer works for non-standard ports.
>>>
>>> I opened a ticket and put up a pull request for a proposed fix (that
>>> will, obviously, need to be cherry-picked over to 3.0.x).
>>> - #2049 - Fix issues with ports other than http/80 or https/443.
>>> (proposed pull, https://github.com/gallery/gallery3/pull/201)
>>>
>>> While we're at it, there are three other minor fixes that have caused
>>> minor issues for some users that I think we should include in 3.0.x,
>>> but aren't necessarily show stoppers:
>>> - #2040 - Deactivate modules that no longer exist. (already pulled,
>>> https://github.com/gallery/gallery3/pull/190)
>>> - Follow-on to #1935 - Ensure ffmpeg is executable, remove possible
>>> doubled "/" (already pulled,
>>> https://github.com/gallery/gallery3/pull/198)
>>> - If tests throw an exception, don't throw another by calling an
>>> undefined variable. (proposed pull,
>>> https://github.com/gallery/gallery3/pull/199)
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Take care,
>>> Shad
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7 March 2013 22:17, Chad Kieffer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Ugh. We just cutover to a new trading system at work and there have been
>>>> lots of little wrinkles to iron out. Might not get to test until after 5.
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 7, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Shad Laws <shad-xpYdmXCiSuZWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I know you meant Chad and not Shad (*), but FWIW, my production site
>>>>> is still in 3.0.x (uses non-3.1.x-compatible theme) and seems pretty
>>>>> happy.  I've played around cranking code obfuscation up and down, and
>>>>> where things used to break they now work quite nicely :-).  Also, the
>>>>> auto-deactivate works, movies with special characters work, etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> Take care,
>>>>> Shad
>>>>>
>>>>> (*) If only I had a dime for every time someone meant Shad and said
>>>>> Chad... :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7 March 2013 19:34, Bharat Mediratta <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> How'd it go, Chad?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Chad Kieffer <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> I'm still running/tracking 3.0. Will pull and test tonight.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 6, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Bharat Mediratta <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've done the final cherry pick.  My production gallery has moved to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> 3.1.x branch so I'm not using this in production.  Is anybody on this
>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>> tracking the 3.0.x branch still who can do a sanity check for us
>>>>>>> before we
>>>>>>> push out a new release?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Shad Laws <shad-xpYdmXCiSuZWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> ... and the winner of the award for the most typo-laden,
>>>>>>>> tense-mismatched, mis-conjugated email goes to... ouf. :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 6 March 2013 14:57, Shad Laws <shad-xpYdmXCiSuZWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've been perusing the forums, and it looks like we've caught most
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> the immediate bug fixes we need for 3.0.6.  The only thing I see
>>>>>>>>> left
>>>>>>>>> is to cherry-pick the deactivate-missing-modules patch from 3.1.x to
>>>>>>>>> 3.0.6 (#2040 for 3.1, #2044 for 3.0.6).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Bigger issues we've fixed (stuff I've seen people report in forms):
>>>>>>>>> - #2031 - fixed the Zend Guard Loader issues once and for all and
>>>>>>>>> stripped our faulty patch - woohoo!
>>>>>>>>> - #2017, 2019 - fixed the Flowplayer issues with special characters
>>>>>>>>> (and upgraded)
>>>>>>>>> - #2029, #2018, #2030 - fix thumb hover effect (and get rid of
>>>>>>>>> browser-dependent JS)
>>>>>>>>> - #2040 - Deactivates modules that no longer exist (well, TBD)
>>>>>>>>> - Fixed issues with logs filling up with "error: 1" entries (left
>>>>>>>>> over
>>>>>>>>> from #1821)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Smaller issues we've fixed (stuff I haven't seem people necessarily
>>>>>>>>> request):
>>>>>>>>> - #2024 - fixed the movie names that weren't hidden like photo names
>>>>>>>>> - #2037 - fix seemly-innocuous bug in item model where $item was
>>>>>>>>> used
>>>>>>>>> instead of $this
>>>>>>>>> - #2020 - added a CLI argument to set the admin password when
>>>>>>>>> installing (nice for devs)
>>>>>>>>> - #2021 - cleaned up thumb_dirty and resize_dirty for movies and
>>>>>>>>> albums (also gives us a new core module version number, which is
>>>>>>>>> handy)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anything else?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Take care,
>>>>>>>>> Shad
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The
>>>>>>>> Forrester
>>>>>>>> Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
>>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
>>>>>>>> __[ g a l l e r y - d e v e l ]_________________________
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [ list info/archive --> http://gallery.sf.net/lists.php ]
>>>>>>>> [ gallery info/FAQ/download --> http://gallery.sf.net ]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The
>>>>>>> Forrester
>>>>>>> Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
>>>>>>> tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> __[ g a l l e r y - d e v e l ]_________________________
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ list info/archive --> http://gallery.sf.net/lists.php ]
>>>>>>> [ gallery info/FAQ/download --> http://gallery.sf.net ]
>>>>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester
>>> Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the
>>> endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to
>>> tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report.
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
>>> __[ g a l l e r y - d e v e l ]_________________________
>>>
>>> [ list info/archive --> http://gallery.sf.net/lists.php ]
>>> [ gallery info/FAQ/download --> http://gallery.sf.net ]
>>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symantec Endpoint Protection 12 positioned as A LEADER in The Forrester  
Wave(TM): Endpoint Security, Q1 2013 and "remains a good choice" in the  
endpoint security space. For insight on selecting the right partner to 
tackle endpoint security challenges, access the full report. 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/symantec-dev2dev
__[ g a l l e r y - d e v e l ]_________________________

[ list info/archive --> http://gallery.sf.net/lists.php ]
[ gallery info/FAQ/download --> http://gallery.sf.net ]