Re: off topic (was Re: URIEquivalence-15 and IRIs)

On Tuesday, June 4, 2002, at 02:46  PM, William F. Hammond wrote:

>> But that's text format too.  I expect you'd prefer:
>> http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/html/rfc2629.html
>
> If you want a clean copy of the DTD, the text/plain is better.
>
> Can anyone offer a pointer to an instance of XML source under the rfc
> document type?  Perhaps, the XML source for RFC 2629.

http://xml.resource.org/public/rfc/xml/rfc2629.xml

change the four-digit number to get a different RFC.
--
Aaron Swartz [http://www.aaronsw.com]