Re: Making 3.2.0 a replacement for 3.1.6
Gilles Detillieux <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.htdig.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
According to Lachlan Andrew: > If we are to phase out 3.1.x, then I think we need to be able to > produce small, fast databases for those who don't need 3.2.x > features, like phrase searching. I propose having a "store_phrases" > configuration attribute (defaulting to true?). If that is false, > only the first occurrence of each word in each document will be > stored. This will result in a smaller database and faster searching. > As a side benefit, it should also increase the speed of digging. > > I don't want to "add a feature" at this point, but to me, the large > time/storage requirements are more a bug than a missing feature. > > Thoughts? Apart from maybe the whole Release vs Destroy issue, I don't see anything in your patch that gives me cause for concern. Of course, we need to give it a good workout. I'm not opposed to adding features now, as long as they're reasonably simple and testable. -- Gilles R. Detillieux E-mail: <[email protected]> Spinal Cord Research Centre WWW: http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/ Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba Winnipeg, MB R3E 3J7 (Canada) ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297 _______________________________________________ ht://Dig Developer mailing list: [email protected] List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev