Re: 3.2.0 - is it worth it??

chris albone <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.htdig.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Agreed..

And there are those of us that are quiet, but happily using the code in 
production...

peace
chris
On 31/05/2004, at 5:10 PM, Gabriele Bartolini wrote:

> Il gio, 2004-05-13 alle 23:25, Joe R. Jah ha scritto:
>> You have been a great bulwark for htdig, specially recently.  You have
>> brought 3.2 to the verge of release.  How can you make such an ominous
>> pronouncement?  It can't be just the indexing speed; is it?
>
> Sorry guys, I had been away in the last couple weeks and I have been
> busy at work.
>
> I have been reading with sadness this thread, as I believe ht://Dig 3.2
> is a good product and giving up now is like throwing away and wasting
> the work of many people (including me).
>
> I believe that 3.2 is worth it.
>
> -Gabriele
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
> Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 
> 10g.
> Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> ht://Dig Developer mailing list:
> [email protected]
> List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.)
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
ht://Dig Developer mailing list:
[email protected]
List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.)
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.