Re: boolean terms in phrase - bug?
"Joe R. Jah" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.htdig.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 [email protected] wrote: > Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:46:12 +0200 > From: [email protected] > To: Joe R. Jah <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Cc: Christopher Murtagh <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Subject: Re: [htdig-dev] boolean terms in phrase - bug? > > Hi guys, > > Is it possible to have this patch so that I can commit it before 3.2.0b6 > is released? Thank you very much. > > -Gabriele > ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.2.0b5/boolean-patch.0 I have tested it successfully; it is now in production;) Chris also reported to have successfully tested it. Regards, Joe -- _/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o _/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_) _/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah [email protected] > >-- Messaggio originale -- > >From: "Joe R. Jah" <[email protected]> > >To: [email protected] > >cc: Christopher Murtagh <[email protected]>, > > [email protected] > >Subject: Re: [htdig-dev] boolean terms in phrase - bug? > >Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:35:36 -0700 (PDT) > > > > > >On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 [email protected] wrote: > > > >> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:46:59 +1000 > >> From: [email protected] > >> To: Joe R. Jah <[email protected]>, > > Christopher Murtagh <[email protected]> > >> Cc: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: [htdig-dev] boolean terms in phrase - bug? > >> > >> Greetings all, > >> > >> The attached patch should get things working. > > > >Thanks Lachlan. What a relief! I have enabled boolean option on my > >search forms again;) > > > >Regards, > > > >Joe > >-- > > _/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o > > _/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_ > > _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_) > > _/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah [email protected] > > > >> Thanks again, Chris, for pointing this bug out. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Lachlan > >> > >> > >> >-- Original Message -- > >> >On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Christopher Murtagh wrote: > >> > > >> >> That's what I thought. Thanks for the feedback. In my position, I'm > >> >> fortunate that I have a php wrapper that is cleaning up all input > before > >> >> it is sent to htsearch, so I can write a little function that will > strip > >> >> these. However, it might be a good idea for the htdig team to let > other > >> >> folks who are currently using 3.2 in production about this as this > makes > >> >> it easy to cripple any machine running htdig 3.2 with boolean search > >> >> feature. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ ht://Dig Developer mailing list: [email protected] List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.) https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev