Re: [htdig-members] Results of Possible Efficiency improvment for 3.2.0
Neal Richter <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:37:00 -0700 (MST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.htdig.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Jim wrote:
> Moved this to developers list.
>
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Neal Richter wrote:
>
>> As far as speed testing I would love it if a couple of you could
>> index a decent sized site (pefferable local to eliminate network latency)
>> with and without the index compression enabled and report back your speed &
>> size results.
>>
>> wordlist_compress: false
>> wordlist_compress_zlib: false
>
> Here is what I got.
>
> With compression:
> 2296.03 user
> 224.52 system
> 8:10:56 elapsed
>
> 10592256 Jan 10 09:46 db.docdb
> 10461184 Jan 10 09:44 db.docs.index
> 90120192 Jan 10 09:44 db.excerpts
> 113465344 Jan 10 09:44 db.words.db
> 16384 Jan 10 09:44 db.words.db_weakcmpr
>
> Without compression:
> 450.46 user
> 123.33 system
> 4:56:01 elapsed
Wow.. quite a difference.
> Misplaced the file sizes for this run. I can rerun it some night if it
> is important.
If you can some time..
Thanks.
--
Neal Richter
Knowledgebase Developer
RightNow Technologies, Inc.
Customer Service for Every Web Site
Office: 406-522-1485
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
ht://Dig Developer mailing list:
[email protected]
List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.)
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev