Re: [htdig-members] Results of Possible Efficiency improvment for 3.2.0

Neal Richter <[email protected]> Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:37:00 -0700 (MST)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.htdig.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Jim wrote:

> Moved this to developers list.
>
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Neal Richter wrote:
>
>> 	As far as speed testing I would love it if a couple of you could 
>> index a decent sized site (pefferable local to eliminate network latency) 
>> with and without the index compression enabled and report back your speed & 
>> size results.
>> 
>> wordlist_compress:         false
>> wordlist_compress_zlib:    false
>
> Here is what I got.
>
> With compression:
>  2296.03 user
>  224.52 system
>  8:10:56 elapsed
>
>  10592256 Jan 10 09:46 db.docdb
>  10461184 Jan 10 09:44 db.docs.index
>  90120192 Jan 10 09:44 db.excerpts
>  113465344 Jan 10 09:44 db.words.db
>     16384 Jan 10 09:44 db.words.db_weakcmpr
>
> Without compression:
>  450.46 user
>  123.33 system
>  4:56:01 elapsed

   Wow.. quite a difference.


>  Misplaced the file sizes for this run. I can rerun it some night if it
>  is important.

    If you can some time..

   Thanks.

-- 
Neal Richter 
Knowledgebase Developer
RightNow Technologies, Inc.
Customer Service for Every Web Site
Office: 406-522-1485



-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
ht://Dig Developer mailing list:
[email protected]
List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.)
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev