Re: Compression related performance

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Neal Richter wrote:

>>> Thanks for the numbers.  Pretty different from Joe's.
>> 
>> Yes they are; can you explain it?
>
>  #1)  What is the size of  wordlist_cache_size?

I use the default.

>  #2)  wordlist_page_size?

Again the default for 3.2.0b6.

>  #3)  Are either of you using a journaling filesystem?

Yes. I use ext3.

>  #4)  Does one of you have somekind of high performance disk-drive?

Nothing extraordinary. The drive system consists of three 10k SCSI's with
hardware RAID 5.


Jim


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
ht://Dig Developer mailing list:
[email protected]
List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.)
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev