Re: tidy binaries

At 4:59 AM +0200 5/23/05, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>* Cory Nelson wrote:
>>Hello all, I have updated the tidy binaries page with the latest
>>sources.  Sorry it took so long, I've been busy as of late.


I know that feeling.


>>minor patchwork on tidy.c line 587- warning about casting on const.
>>this fixes it:
>>const TidyOption* e1 = (const TidyOption*)e1_;
>>const TidyOption* e2 = (const TidyOption*)e2_;
>
>Thanks, can anyone apply this patch?


Done.


>>I wanted to get a 64-bit build out there, but noticed there is casting
>>between pointers and ulong (which is 32-bit) all over the place.  Is
>>there a reason these weren't just kept as pointers?
>
>http://tidy.sf.net/bug/685603 and some discussion on this list have
>details. If I remember correctly, the current code should reflect
>changes for 64Bit support on some non-Win32 platforms. As I've pointed
>out in the bug report, this does not play well with Win32.


In response to <http://tidy.sf.net/bug/1192885>, I have started looking at
64-bit support again. I have got a bunch of warnings when building 64-bit
on my platform, that I need to sort out - I will add info to the 64-bit bug
report and/or fix the obvious problems.


FYI, there are some changes being made on SourceForge that might affect the
automated builds of Tidy. I also need to update the auto-updating of the
docs now that docs in XML format are produced by Tidy itself. So there
might be some breakage for a while...


Regards, Terry




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click