Re: Tidy bug

Ben McCann wrote:
> Klaus, Charlie,
> Thank you both for taking a quick look at this issue for me.  I see 
> what's going on here now.
> I expected behavior closer to what Charlie described.  I think that 
> discarding the extra end tag </tr> would would make the most sense.  
> But in my opinion the behavior Charlie described would be preferable 
> to the current behavior.
I agree that in the specific example that would be the desirable 
behaviour. Recognizing in general that a later element may be misplaced 
and should be moved above the current element is difficult though. The 
current behaviour is that elements are not discarded but instead 
required parent elements are added to the tree.

One thing I can think of that would help with this example is discarding 
elements for which only an end tag is found, rather than generating a 
corresponding start tag. Can anyone think of a reason why that might not 
be desirable?

Regards, Klaus

-- 
Klaus Johannes Rusch
[email protected]
http://www.atmedia.net/KlausRusch/


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference