Re: XHTML Basic 1.1 and setting input field to numeric mode

Tina Holmboe <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.html.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 04:28:15PM +0200, Luca Passani wrote:

> migrating existing web apps. So, what's the point in having this petty  
> feature creep in late versions of a completely different standard? 

  It's not "feature creep". The XHTML working group is tasked with
  maintaining the 1.* series of markup languages as well as developing
  XHTML 2 - and there is consensus for, at some point, removing 
  the STYLE attribute because it /is/ mixing presentation and
  content.

  And that's why it is being deprecated, as Shane pointed out, to 'warn'
  developers of what is to come.


> If you ask me, someone here isn't understanding developers.

  We /are/ developers - but we have a different set of responsibilities,
  and among them is to, in a controlled and regulated manner, remove cruft
  from the language(s).

  Personally I think I do know myself :), but using STYLE has never been
  a good way of maintaining quality code with good separation between layout
  and content. The problem with merging differently-styled content is
  largely due to this, but it is also a different topic.

-- 
 -  Tina Holmboe           siteSifter                  Greytower Technologies
                 http://www.sitesifter.co.uk          http://www.greytower.net
            Website Quality and Accessibility Testing
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.