Re: Cleaning House
Tina Holmboe <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.html.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17 Nov, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> Section 3.6 would be much simpler if it didn't have to worry about
>> optional and implied tags.
>>
>> Section 3.8 would almost disappear.
>
> Why does the size of the spec matter? Surely the benefit to authors far,
> far outweigh the benefits to the spec community?
A monolithic specification is less likely to be read. A shorter, to
the point, specification benefit content and site creators alike.
--
- Tina Holmboe siteSifter Greytower Technologies
http://www.sitesifter.co.uk http://www.greytower.net
Website Quality and Accessibility Testing