Re: [OFF TOPIC] CRUD table form problems

On 26 Mar 2009, at 17:08, Philip & Le Khanh wrote:

> Well, not "preposterous", but possibly oxymoronic.
> Thufir, John's point (if it is unclear) is that there
> is no such concept as "sufficiently valid"; either
> a document is valid, or it is not : there are no
> in-between states (/tertium non datur/).  Of course,
> there are certain projects currently underway that
> seek to re-define "valid", but that is another matter
> entirely ...
>
> Philip TAYLOR
> --------

If he didn't regret his mistake in emailing this list before, he  
probably does now.

--
Stephen