Re: Future of HttpUnit?
Russell Gold <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.httpunit.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 9, 2006, at 2:19 AM, Brad Clarke wrote: > I've been watching this conversation with a highly biased thought > in my head. I > really hate to be a troll here, but with this latest bit I feel I > have to say > something. > > When initially evaluating HttpUnit for our testing needs I found > that a primary > virtue of HttpUnit was it's ability to be mostly divorced from the > content of the > page, instead focusing primarily on the HTTP protocol and giving > the tool much more > of a unit testing feel and the greater speed that goes with it. As > I was trying to > build/replace an acceptance testing framework this was not exactly > what I was > looking for. > > I also looked at HtmlUnit. While it's much more difficult (if not > just impossible) > to do the sort of direct unit testing that HttpUnit can do, it was > much more focused > on the content of the page and maintaining state just as a real > browser does. This > was most noticeable in HtmlUnit's greater support for JavaScript, > which made it much > more suited for the type of testing I was looking to do. I ended up > going with > HtmlUnit as our tool and eventually becoming a developer on the > project (hence the > bias). > > The reason I feel I need to say something now is that this design > change you mention > would be moving toward the same model HtmlUnit already has. Maybe > it would be to the > advantage of both projects if instead people were just refered to > the HtmlUnit > project when this level of functionality is required? To me the two > tools have clear > and distict "markets" and attempting to overlap them any more than > required seems to > be a waste of obviously limited resources. What I am talking about is actually getting closer to HttpUnit's original roots. I believe that I can accomplish that without losing any of HttpUnit's strengths - it's actually a simplification of the code. While the model is superficially similar to that of HtmlUnit, I think that there are vital philosophical approach differences, although I would have to look again at HtmlUnit to see. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642