Re: Education is not about content
"Livia Labate" <[email protected]> Mon, 17 Nov 2003 12:05:45 -0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.ia.education |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <009c01c3ad13$e5c4a700$0100a8c0@livlab> |
: This is getting a little clearer in my head through our discussion. : Perhaps when we talk about this subject we should make a distinction : among competencies, methodologies, and philosophy. I really like how you've split that up. : should "aim higher than conveying content and skills as something we : could or should do as instructors of IA." And yet I don't think we have : much agreement on the basic competencies required. Do you want to create a list of competencies? I think the *ideal* way would be analysing the philosophy to see which competencies would be needed to support it. That of course, is only possible in Utopia where we can sit around all day and wonder about it :) We could, however, take the statistical approach and gather all competencies we can find (which are being taught or discussed elsewhere) and sort them out in terms of relevance to that philosophy (impulsive classification is an IA disease, is it not?). Were you thinking of something like that? I didn't think you'd want to get to the competencies yet, but discuss the philosophy first. Since that is the reference to the competencies relevance I think it makes sense.