Re: Re: Feature Requests

Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.links
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 11:14:03AM +0530, Ligesh wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 04:57:44AM +0000, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote:
> > 
> > I've thought about adding more bindings, but I'm not sure how much work
> > it would be in the end to make the built-in text editor usable. However,
> > have you tried the external editor support? While editing a text field,
> > press ctrl-t to launch your preferred editor (configurable under
> > Setup -> Options manager -> Document -> Browsing -> Forms -> External editor
> > or by setting $EDITOR). The sad part is that this doesn't work if you
> > run multiple ELinks processes--only the first (the 'master terminal')
> > will be able to run an external editor.
> 
>  Thanks for the quick response. Actually, I don't want a full fledged editor. I use vim for that. I am talking about simple edit box, where you fill in simple forms. For text forms, vim is the only way. It is just that I am really used to unconsciously pressing <c-w> to delete the word, wherever I am typing. (Even the old gtk forms supports it). So I am talking about simple editing, for instance, in the input URL box. The general editing for simple data everywhere; filling in forms etc.

I'll see about adding a few actions tomorrow.

> > >                                                                                                                        Second, I was not able change the colour of the 'selected-link'. The selected link--and also the forms--appear in 'reverse-video', which is a bit hurting to the eye. I tried all sorts of tricks, incluing changing the reverse property of the xterm/screen, but didn't work out. So I would like to know if it is possible to add this.
> > 
> > The colour settings for the active link are not with the other colours
> > settings under Setup -> Options manager -> Document -> Default color
> > settings; for some reason, they are under Document -> Browsing -> Links
> > -> Active link.
> 
> 
>  YES! I am an idiot. :-) The problem is that the elinks.conf did not contain all the options. Only if you change an option, does it save it in elinks.conf. You should simply have a basic elinks.conf that people can customize, but I guess the menu is good enough. I am not really good with menu searching.

There is an elinks.conf in the contrib/ directory. However, to make sure
that you have the latest set of options, I recommend that you simply set
config.saving_style = 2 and resave.

> > Go to Setup -> Keybinding manager and bind some keys
> > to move-cursor-left, -down, -up, and -right. Is that what you wanted?
> 
>  That configuration is what I am using now, but it will hang if there are no links directly underneath. Let me explain my movement system once more. The movement of left/right arrows is straightforward. The movement for up/down is this: It moves STRAIGHT UP till it reaches a line containing a url anywhere. I am sorry if it is odd, but after using emacs-w3m for more than 3 years, I have found this to be the best option.
> 
>  Let us say the text is like this: the [] is the cursor on line 4 here, and <link:> are text that are linked.
> 
> -----------------------
>  1: Elinks kicks ass <link:>
>  2: download it <link:here>
>  3: yup great idea
>  4: so []what's to do <link:>  (contains the cursor)
> --------------------
> 
>  Now if I press up arrow:
> 
> -----------------------
>  1: Elinks kicks ass <link:>
>  2: dow[]nload it <link:here> (Cursor Here. No horizontal motion)
>  3: yup great idea
>  4: so what's to do <link:>
> --------------------
> 
> 
>  So the cursor has moved STRAIGHT UP. It skipped line 3 because it did not contain a link. It went to line 2, but it did not directly move to the link, but it is STRAIGHT UP from its old position. Now you have to use <right> arrow to move it to the actual link.

Would you be happy with the move-link-left, -down, -up, and -right
actions? If not, it shouldn't be _too_ hard to program what you want,
but I'm not sure we need _another_ set of move-... actions...

>  Thanks again for your help.

No problem.

-- 
Miciah Masters <[email protected]> / <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
elinks-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.