Re: Feature Requests
Ligesh <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.links |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 06:31:47AM +0000, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote: > On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 10:48:59AM +0530, Ligesh wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 08:47:59PM +0000, Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters wrote: > > > > > > This should be easy enough. Should I just use isalnum instead of > > > isspace? Next question: Should this be configurable? We already have too > > > many options. > > > > Yeah true. No. It is not configurable. They are separate motions altogether. And the kill-word-back actually means that it will do till a metachar. > > What do you mean? Are you asserting that because it has 'word' in the > name, it should stop at non-alphanumeric characters? > I can tell you how it is in bash. Bash has two actions. backward-kill-word: This does what I had proposed. Kill a previous word till it reaches a metachar (non-alphanumeric). unix-word-rubout: This deletes the previous characters till it encounters a space. So I think in kill-word-back, it should be alnum. *If YOU want* you can implement a 'unix-word-rubout' too, but that's not really needed. I personally dislike the concept of 'unix-word-rubout'. Especially when you type in a url, you would want to remove the last directory, and not the entire string. So I presonally would prefer kill-word-back to use '!isalnum' rather than 'isspace'. So yes, just replacing isspace, with !isalnum should fix it. Thanks a lot. _______________________________________________ elinks-dev mailing list [email protected] http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev