Re: witekfl branch status
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.links |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Witold Filipczyk <[email protected]> writes: > Do you think that maintaining 3 versions of ELinks is reasonable? With this few people hacking on ELinks, I think it would be better to maintain just one stable and one development branch. Thus, the ELinks 0.10 branch should be dropped now, and the ELinks 0.11 branch should be dropped when 0.12.0 is released. (There should first be some release candidates, though.) Fonseca, you're the maintainer; do you authorize this? When a security vulnerability is found, I think it is good to test for it in many released versions, even ones that are no longer maintained and won't be fixed. _______________________________________________ elinks-dev mailing list [email protected] http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 188 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF5JuiHm9IGt60eMgRAjDnAKDXgAM/DHq2wCohxIH02RxiweOvCwCfS/Jd TpZdkDm5kM28Xch4mdG6ifI= =uN2j -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----