Re: Bug#337159: elinks: Does not recover from CTRL-Z
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.links |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Y Giridhar Appaji Nag <[email protected]> writes: > See also: http://bugs.debian.org/331409#57 Thank you for the pointer. However, I think it would be wrong to reopen bug 331409 for the Bash-ELinks interaction, because it was originally about a busy loop in Bash and that's not what happens in bug 337159. What is the procedure for asking the Bash maintainer whether he considers the loss of SIGCONT a bug in Bash or in ELinks (and if the latter, how else should ELinks be implemented)? I suppose I shouldn't just reassign bug 337159 to bash. _______________________________________________ elinks-dev mailing list [email protected] http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 188 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHl7F3Hm9IGt60eMgRAs3xAKDgdVoBfM6xSbYAwTFjbEMiHlxUSwCeKAcR ckJBssNYRhNCBAQb9zjthSg= =cWVf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----