Re: GCC Runtime Library Exception doubt
Timo Juhani Lindfors <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:04:37 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.links |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <[email protected]> writes: > What to do? My personal order of preference would be > (e) Relicense ELinks so it becomes GPLv3 compatible: most likely > (f) Relicense ELinks so it becomes GCC compatible even though not > (a) Find some creative interpretation that allows binaries to be > (h) Make sure that ELinks does not use any libraries from GCC. > (g) Convince the FSF to allow distributing GCC runtime library > (d) Switch to some other compiler entirely. Perhaps TCC, or the > (c) Keep compiling ELinks with older versions of GCC. > (b) Stop distributing binaries. Well we don't have any at Anyone can hereby distribute my past contributions to the elinks project under the terms of GPLv2 or later + openssl exception if that helps at all. (I only wrote a small HTTPS proxy support patch ages ago...) best regards, Timo Lindfors _______________________________________________ elinks-dev mailing list [email protected] http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/elinks-dev
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 188 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJ5loFOpmT8yqc6uIRAqcBAKDniPcGNbUNuJ4XTARAguDcwQg2RACgixoj NCdLlehkG9mSs7h/mbP9Vis= =aFym -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----