Re: Lynx and Wordpress?
Karen Lewellen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.lynx.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi there, I agree with ease, my personal site is in html, so when I have to change things like a phone number, I can just use an editor. However, this site will be new. dreamhost provides the WordPress tool, but they also just provide regular ftp for uploading. If I could find someone willing to do the work, I would just pay them within, reason. Everything will be local, as in in my dream host workspace. just desire a tool, and since WordPress is offered, thought I would ask. Keeping in mind that I use shellworld, although I do have links for DOS on my computer, any easy creation tool that is not WordPress then? Karen On Sat, 31 Dec 2022, Tim Chase wrote: > On 2022-12-30 23:42, Karen Lewellen wrote: >> While I generally have few issues accessing WordPress created >> sites, at least the one I have encountered, that does not necessarily >> translate to the tool itself. > > If I understand correctly, I believe you're talking about the > accessibility of the admin/authoring portions of Wordpress which > is independent of the accessibility of the resulting site published > using Wordpress. > >> Anyone successfully use WordPress with Lynx? > > It's been a while since I've played with an install. If the > admin/authoring panel isn't accessible from lynx (which might well > be the case since there was a major shift a while back in the > content-editor widget, changing from a more straightforward text > entry box to a rich-edit box), there's "wp-cli" (https://wp-cli.org/) > utility which lets you manage just about every aspect of a Wordpress > install from the command-line, including posting and comment > management. > > That said, unless I *have* to use Wordpress for something, I generally > prefer using a static site generator (SSG) to maintain my personal > sites. I use a combination of Nikola (https://getnikola.com/) and > a custom SSG that I wrote for my own uses depending on which site. > But there are lots of others like Hugo or Jekyll. Big advantages > include: > > - everything is local > > - the generation process just creates an "output/" folder that you > can copy up to your server however you want (whether FTP, rsync, > scp, or some web GUI) > > - there's nothing dynamic on the server that could be exploited/hacked > since it's all just text files > > - the resulting pages are FAST even on a ridiculously underpowered > VPS instance or shared-hosting box > > Anyways, just a collection of my random thoughts & ramblings. > > -tim > > > > >