Re: lynx and webmail interfaces?

Agree about spam assassin.
However the owners of shellworld disliked the program, so instead of 
individual  choice for users, they took the choice away from everyone.
did try to use my password at gmail, likely the code got filtered as 
spam..for which I have no folder.



On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Jude DaShiell wrote:

> panix.com has both roundcube and squirrelmail but we found both of those
> interfaces are inaccessible for command line users of linux so although I
> could set them up I couldn't access them effectively.  That's why I am
> using spamassassin.
>
> -- 
> Jude <jdashiel at panix dot com>
> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
> soap, ballot, jury, and ammo.
> Please use in that order."
> Ed Howdershelt 1940.
>
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Karen Lewellen wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>> As some may know google is force feeding the removal of access for basic html.
>> For me personally this presents several issues, shellworld is amazing in
>> general, but the owners have removed the right to review spam here all
>> together.
>> There is a thread over at DOS ain't dead about providers who  still have web
>> interfaces, using roundcube or squirrel mail, someone even spoke of fastmail.
>> Anyone know of  either an email service that incorporates these lower graphics
>> interfaces, or host mail  in a way that allows  full detailed inbox access in
>> a reliable way.
>> Even Links with its JavaScript touches, and elinks when compiled for
>> JavaScript might be an option, but asking about Lynx in case I have missed a
>> door.
>> Am a bit shaky here, lots of please fit into our disability box, or there is
>> no place for our freakishness stuff in my life lately.
>> I do not want to chance a gmail login, until i know where I am
>> going..shellworld is my alternative address for gmail, and with no spam folder
>> I might miss the two factor  code option.
>> Lynx ideas for email?
>> Thanks,
>> Karen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>