Re: ANN: lynx2.9.0

Thomas Dickey dixit:

>> This is a regression and makes me think I’m on a link.
>
>I don't recall this being commented on before (a mailing-list link helps).

?!

It’s a regression against the earlier snapshot, i.e. a new bug.

>> I haven’t yet run into the issue that http-without-s connections
>> don’t work any more, did you do anything or is that related to me
>> switching to OpenSSL, from nōnGNUtls, for the build?
>
>I've only seen this with my earlier change for Debian #1033423.

Huh, fun. But I’ve run into that same issue way too often as well,
I had to gdb $(which lynx) $(pidof lynx), print close(5), ^D, to
get it to continue, and I’m glad that’s fixed.

That’s not the one I was thinking of, which was lynx immediately
returned, not getting stuck; that’s the thread around
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/lynx-dev/2023-12/msg00000.html
though I don’t see my other reply to that in the archives for some
reason.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
<ch> you introduced a merge commit        │<mika> % g rebase -i HEAD^^
<mika> sorry, no idea and rebasing just fscked │<mika> Segmentation
<ch> should have cloned into a clean repo      │  fault (core dumped)
<ch> if I rebase that now, it's really ugh     │<mika:#grml> wuahhhhhh