Re: editors and spell checking?
Karen Lewellen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.lynx.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
My pico is edition 5.0 plus. Pico is more flexible, speaking personally. nano, again speaking personally makes odd choices, like going to the end of a a document. The recent nano on the Ubuntu setup for dreamhost no longer even uses the control t for spell checking. Personal preferences are the soul of personal computing laughs. On Wed, 3 Apr 2024, [email protected] wrote: > Pico and nano are basically the same editor, just a later version, (you know, > pico is version 1.0, nano is version 2.0). > > The way to run aspell or spell is exactly the same regardless of the name of > the editor in this case. > > ctrl-t asks you what program to run, type spell or aspell, depending on what > you have installed, and you're all done. > > That's all there is to it. > > And, just for reference, Nano uses the same exact keystrokes as pico, I know, > because I used pico for years before it got switched to nano, and I've not > changed a single thing in how I use the program, and it still does everything > exactly the same as it did before. > > No difference. > > > On 4/2/2024 11:25 PM, Karen Lewellen wrote: >> apparently? >> There is more to this solution, at least where the speller is concerned. >> the editor in lynx in use is pico..cannot fault them there, I prefer it to >> nano as well. >> Alpine in their setup is using aspell for spell checking, so they want to >> add this on the editor line. >> Pico runs fine by itself when added to the editor line in the lynx >> options menu. but it does not seem to provide things like >> alternative words, or look up or anything as if a speller was in >> use...meaning something else is required. >> Apparently adding the line as it appears in the alpine setup screen is not >> working either. >> Does pico need a configuration file to run with a spell checker? >> thanks, >> Karen >> >> >> On Tue, 2 Apr 2024, Tim Chase wrote: >> >> > Replying inline >> > >> > On 2024-04-02 15:33, Karen Lewellen wrote: >> > > I am helping someone resolve an issue, they have access to lynx, but >> > > the >> > > editor field is blank. >> > > They are using Ubuntu. >> > >> > If they're already comfortable with a preferred editor, you can >> > tell Lynx to use that on the command-line with the "-editor" option: >> > >> > $ lynx -editor=/usr/bin/nano http://example.com >> > >> > They might even have configured their system to use "sensible-editor" >> > in which case >> > >> > $ lynx -editor=/usr/bin/sensible-editor http://example.com >> > >> > should invoke their preferred editor. >> > >> > Alternatively, you can use "o" to go to the lynx options, check the >> > "Save options to disk" checkbox, set the Editor value in there, and >> > save the options. >> > >> > Strangely, lynx doesn't honor the common method of setting either >> > the $EDITOR or $VISUAL environment variable. >> > >> > > In alpine for example there is a field for editor, and one for spell >> > > checking, I admit to thinking they worked together as in are software >> > > dependent. >> > >> > They can be the same thing or they can be different tools. Some >> > editors have spell-check support, some don't; so you might want an >> > external spell-checker. >> > >> > > Does lynx work the same? meaning does there need to be one field >> > > for the editor and one for spell checker? >> > >> > I don't think lynx has anything spell-checking-related, just >> > editor-related. However, if they use an editor with built-in >> > spell-checking, that would do the trick. >> > >> > > or is it enough to make sure the chosen editor is configured >> > > to use the desired spell checker. meaning adding the editor will >> > > allow for spell checking as well? >> > >> > I believe this is the case. I know that vim and emacs both have >> > support for spell-checking. And nano does too if you enable it and >> > add a spell-checking package: >> > >> > $ sudo apt-get install spell >> > >> > With the spell-checker installed, you should be able to use control+t >> > in nano to spell-check the file. >> > >> > Hopefully that helps, >> > >> > -tim >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >