Re: new redirection codes
Thomas Dickey <[email protected]> Sun, 11 May 2025 19:11:36 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.lynx.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 12:43:06AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Hi, > > lynx only supports the old 301/302 redirection codes, > not the new 307/308 ones whose semantics are more useful; > unsure (I’ve not tested it) whether 303 is supported right. > > 301/302 may change the request method from POST to GET > (IIRC lynx asks interactively which is good), whereas > 308/307 (in this order) are the same but require the client > to resend exactly the same request to the redirection target. > > There’s more explanation and a short summary of the other > codes in both answers (together) of > <https://stackoverflow.com/q/42136829/2171120> for reference. > > Please add support for 307/308 to the next lynx (basically > same as the existing redirect sans the interactive question). I don't see a patch. -- Thomas E. Dickey <[email protected]> https://invisible-island.net
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 659 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAABCgAdFiEEGYgtkt2kxADCLA1WzCr0RyFnvgMFAmghLqgACgkQzCr0RyFn vgMRjAv/fTT2QcMsOaN7TvjRsvwgdwkFH5bdzQNPj9hrLWIyzA1UH0RNVx7Owe/X dPpV0HlZatC27xbNtHflDrSOMyvB9yOr21412OU6MiHwND4smhNd7uez/WZvxyfL T46b5YDpb7gfGSVZ4Zb66x0upSp4olJ6XRiRcLD78OtAoBDqtxNbfUqoUs12frod +b7RGAkSb4dA239hEub5z6Vw2Dh53HQIwHTY/gt0LEC6D6Hg99gMn7JfAKdmMeGC c0UoVIfUoFlzmEC4Pkdg1rGJsjio7uooaJagB9oxvtIxy7FqEQTi2V/1Th4qGBQ1 n/wq6QGdP4X8/7F7M4mmVA2xw3NOaW1jwdUbnVsgEVfFylS7a6nrh//vISFVRQQz UAv0kbhx7E/2Dcf+l3qppRDYWssbzAHtQ1kAMrtWnK1Io6KnwsNkCJ2SIPoT4ygY DJ4NvDzcZd12M8sRwaGU58wpXOU7jzDWtFz4HCt8A0CYCivWRwgd9KMOUNCC/qxQ yZsXGuWd =7oNQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----