Re: ..on SOCKS5 support
Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.lynx.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mouse dixit: […] All agreed, but… >replacement you propose "should ... be optimisable", though I do that was not the reason… the code I proposed to be replaced was unportable and just in general bad style. I meant optimise to whatever happens to be nice on the target machine, of course (and if two separate stores are, so be it), it’s easier to recognise from the stores than from the memcpy. But again, not the reason, just side effect ;) Night, //mirabilos, who ought to be sleeping -- Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich* schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz hervorragend. -- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev