Re: Weekly todo activity, Feb 08 to Feb 15
"Jonathan Swartz" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.mason.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The autoflush parameter should literally propagate, but there may be some buffering occurring on the subrequest boundary. I'll take a look at it. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Rolsky" <[email protected]> To: "John Williams" <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 7:45 AM Subject: Re: [Mason-devel] Weekly todo activity, Feb 08 to Feb 15 > On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, John Williams wrote: > > > On a related note, I noticed recently that $m->autoflush does not > > propagate INTO a subrequest. Is there any reason why it shouldn't? > > It does propogate, or at least it should. > > > -dave > > /*======================= > House Absolute Consulting > www.houseabsolute.com > =======================*/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Mason-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mason-devel > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click